Posts Tagged ‘25-hydroxy Vitamin D’

“Baby-Boomers” Should Check Their Bones

June 6, 2014 @ 6:26 am
posted by Dr Ginther

A patient had no idea why her doc sent her to me for a Complete Bone Health Evaluation.  As a “baby-boomer”, she lives by the motto: “You are only as old as you choose to be.”  And she chooses to remain young.  If only it were possible…..

“I can’t have Osteoporosis.  I used to drink milk.  I am active and I plan to stay active!!!  So I just can’t have Osteoporosis!”  Unfortunately, she does have Osteoporosis by BMD on her DXA, by the multiple Vertebral Fractures on VFA, and by FRAX.  Still, there are simple steps to rescue her Bone Health before she Fractures.

Control What You Can

February 17, 2014 @ 9:24 pm
posted by Dr Ginther

Increasing numbers of patients are reluctant to consider pharmaceuticals for their Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk.  You may agree with that.  If you do you MUST be prepared to Take Control Naturally of those issues you can control:  Calcium, Vitamin D, Protein, Vitamins and Minerals, and Exercises for Balance, Strengthening and Posture.

These Natural measures are things that everyone should do for best results, whether taking Osteoporosis Medications or not.  For some individuals they can be enough by themselves.

Punxsutawney Phil saw his shadow today.  Six more weeks of winter.  But NINE more weeks before we can get ANY Vitamin D from the sun in Iowa.  Here the sun is high enough off the horizon only 5 months of the year.  Even in the summer very few Iowans make enough of their own Vitamin D.

In all of 2013 I saw fewer than ten patients with good vitamin D levels from only:  Multiple Vitamins & Minerals, Calcium Plus D Supplements, “Vitamin D Enriched” Milk, and Sunshine combined.  Every other patient needed an additional 1000 IU to over 5000 IU Vitamin D3 supplements daily.

Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics

January 27, 2014 @ 7:05 am
posted by Dr Ginther

Mark Twain and others have said:  ”There are Lies, there are Damn Lies, and then there are Statistics”.  That is the danger when we use Statistics (Meta-Analyses) as a basis for “Evidence-Based” Medicine.  A recent meta-analysis looking at Vitamin D has reached a gaggle of questionable conclusions.  The news media have swallowed it hook, line and sinker, and want you to do so as well.

This meta-analysis re-analyzed 40 old studies which were not designed to track actual 25-hydroxy Vitamin D levels, and used doses of Vitamin D that we now know are too low to be effective.  They looked for diseases which were not specifically tracked, but might be mentioned as incidental findings.  None of these studies individually showed a “statistically significant” finding.  But if you combine enough different studies, the numbers become large enough that “statistical significance” can happen.